Aargh wrote:It's threads like this where I always manage to upset a lot of posters.
The Missouri Valley Conference is one of the longest-running leagues in college athletics. There are still some sportscasters who remember when the Valley was the best basketball league in the nation, and the Valley still gets some run from that historical fact.
Some of the long-term members of the Valley are rightfully proud of their association with the Missouri Valley Conference and its' 60-year tradition of being a solid basketball conference.
Some of the recent D2 upgrade schools (this side of 1970 or so), have received a HUGE boost from joining the Valley. Recruiting to the Valley has been more difficult than recruiting to the Big10 in the D1 history of many MVC members. It wasn't always that way. Recruiting to the Missouri Valley Conference has always been easier than recruiting to the Horizon League, or the Summit League, or any of the other "no name" leagues in the Midwest.
The Missouri Valley Conference is not a "no name" league. Bradley, Drake, and WSU established the name of the Valley as a top conference. The MVC's having Cincinnati, Memphis, and Louisville in the league for a while gave the Missouri Vlley Conference a great reputation.
That reputation was established quite a few years ago, but long-term reputations is what creates traditions. When some of the top teams in the MVC left, they were replaced with teams transitioning to D1 ball. Those teams got a huge boost by joining a well-respected conference. Now, some fans of those schools want to change the name of the conference because the name is not thaat respected any more.
Wasn't it a WSU poster who suggested "Big Valley?"