Bracketology - 2012 edition

Discuss the MVC hoops season here.

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby MSUDuo » March 2nd, 2012, 10:49 am

Time to play Blind Resume!

Team
18-11 (12-5)
RPI is 16 points better than Team B
2-7 v. top50
6-8 v. top100

Team B
17-12(7-10)
RPI is 50+
2-10 v. top50
5-12 v. top100

Both these teams are fighting for one of the last spots in. Which do you have if you had to select the last team in?
User avatar
MSUDuo
MVCfans.com
MVCfans.com
 
Posts: 1390
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 7:49 pm

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby DoubleJayAlum » March 2nd, 2012, 10:53 am

MSUDuo wrote:Time to play Blind Resume!

Team
18-11 (12-5)
RPI is 16 points better than Team B
2-7 v. top50
6-8 v. top100

Team B
17-12(7-10)
RPI is 50+
2-10 v. top50
5-12 v. top100

Both these teams are fighting for one of the last spots in. Which do you have if you had to select the last team in?


Well, if I have to pick one, I pick team A, but I really don't think either team should get in....
User avatar
DoubleJayAlum
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2300
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 12:05 pm

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby shocktheheart » March 2nd, 2012, 10:55 am

DoubleJayAlum wrote:
MSUDuo wrote:Time to play Blind Resume!

Team
18-11 (12-5)
RPI is 16 points better than Team B
2-7 v. top50
6-8 v. top100

Team B
17-12(7-10)
RPI is 50+
2-10 v. top50
5-12 v. top100

Both these teams are fighting for one of the last spots in. Which do you have if you had to select the last team in?


Well, if I have to pick one, I pick team A, but I really don't think either team should get in....



I agree
“I’m gonna punch you in the ovary, that’s what I’m gonna do. A straight shot, right to the babymaker.”
User avatar
shocktheheart
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1346
Joined: August 24th, 2010, 1:43 pm
Location: Wichita

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby CaseyGarrisonforPrez » March 2nd, 2012, 11:37 am

MSUDuo wrote:Time to play Blind Resume!

Team
18-11 (12-5)
RPI is 16 points better than Team B
2-7 v. top50
6-8 v. top100

Team B
17-12(7-10)
RPI is 50+
2-10 v. top50
5-12 v. top100

Both these teams are fighting for one of the last spots in. Which do you have if you had to select the last team in?


Team A. And nationally most everyone will have A ahead of B once they update their mock brackets (Team A just got their best win of the year this week).

Right now I have both in my mock bracket though Team B is sliding quickly. Would be nice to see them in the Dance for the first time however.
CaseyGarrisonforPrez
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 930
Joined: January 23rd, 2011, 11:51 am

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby MSUDuo » March 2nd, 2012, 12:20 pm

DoubleJayAlum wrote:
MSUDuo wrote:Time to play Blind Resume!

Team
18-11 (12-5)
RPI is 16 points better than Team B
2-7 v. top50
6-8 v. top100

Team B
17-12(7-10)
RPI is 50+
2-10 v. top50
5-12 v. top100

Both these teams are fighting for one of the last spots in. Which do you have if you had to select the last team in?


Well, if I have to pick one, I pick team A, but I really don't think either team should get in....



Agreed. But there are 68 spots. Someone HAS to get in...

Team A is USF
Team B is Northwestern

Northwestern has no business being in this year. None what so ever...
User avatar
MSUDuo
MVCfans.com
MVCfans.com
 
Posts: 1390
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 7:49 pm

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby omahaben » March 2nd, 2012, 9:31 pm

The bubble's exceptionally weak right now. There will likely be a few upsets that shrink it, but even still, the 11-13 seeds are going to be weaker than normal. This might be a year when all four 5-seeds advance.

It's really too bad a 3rd Valley team couldn't separate itself from the pack, cause they'd probably make it in easily this year.
omahaben
MVC Bench Warmer
MVC Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 56
Joined: November 18th, 2011, 10:07 am

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby MSUDuo » March 4th, 2012, 1:28 am

I've got 66 spots filled...

It's a complete clusterf#*k around the bubble teams this year... I guess that's usually the case every year...


Conference- # [Bubble In] (Bubble Out)
B1G- 6 (NW)
East- 8 [WVU] (USF, Seton)
SEC- 5 [Miss St] (Tenn)
B12- 6 [Texas]
MWC- 4 [Colorado St]
ACC- 5 [Miami] (NCSt)
A10- 3 [Xavier] (Dayton, St Joe)
MVC- 2
CUSA- 2 (UCF)
Pac12- 2 [Cal] (Oregon, Arizona, Colorado)
WCC- 3 [BYU]
20 should be 1 bid leagues
66 of 68


Who gets the last 2 spots?

My last 6 in would be WVU, Xavier,Texas, Miami, Seton Hall, St Joe

First 4 out: USF, Tennessee, NW, VCU


Good gawd...This is nuts...

HCCM has Tennessee coming out of no where to get on the bubble. They have some terrible losses but that was before Stokes was eligible. They are going to finish 2nd in the SEC if Kentucky beats Florida tomorrow. Lunardi seems to think they need 2 SEC tourney wins to feel good.

Come on Redbirds!!! Knock someone out of the tourney!
User avatar
MSUDuo
MVCfans.com
MVCfans.com
 
Posts: 1390
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 7:49 pm

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby DoubleJayAlum » March 4th, 2012, 9:08 am

MSUDuo wrote:
DoubleJayAlum wrote:
MSUDuo wrote:Time to play Blind Resume!

Team
18-11 (12-5)
RPI is 16 points better than Team B
2-7 v. top50
6-8 v. top100

Team B
17-12(7-10)
RPI is 50+
2-10 v. top50
5-12 v. top100

Both these teams are fighting for one of the last spots in. Which do you have if you had to select the last team in?


Well, if I have to pick one, I pick team A, but I really don't think either team should get in....



Agreed. But there are 68 spots. Someone HAS to get in...

Team A is USF
Team B is Northwestern

Northwestern has no business being in this year. None what so ever...


You left out one important metric when considering Northwestern I think. A SOS of 12 should help them IMO. It shows they went out and played people in the noncon instead of loading up with patsies that BCS schools are wont to do. I think that deserves a nod by the committee.
User avatar
DoubleJayAlum
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2300
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 12:05 pm

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby MSUDuo » March 4th, 2012, 12:20 pm

Don't disagree. But you have to beat someone. All bubble have one thing in common, they have proven they can lose. You have to show that you can beat someone. NW is 1-8 against the top50. 1 win out of 9 chances is pathetic.

Right now I'd really give Tennesse an at-large. Some bad losses, all bubble teams have them, but they have actually have wins against the top50. 4 of them.
User avatar
MSUDuo
MVCfans.com
MVCfans.com
 
Posts: 1390
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 7:49 pm

Re: Bracketology - 2012 edition

Postby Ace Happy » March 4th, 2012, 1:35 pm

DoubleJayAlum wrote:You left out one important metric when considering Northwestern I think. A SOS of 12 should help them IMO. It shows they went out and played people in the noncon instead of loading up with patsies that BCS schools are wont to do. I think that deserves a nod by the committee.


That SOS is due to the Big10 unless you see something in their non-conference schedule below that supports your assertion (losses to Baylor & Creighton?).

11/07/11 vs. Robert Morris (Ill.) # Evanston, Ill. W, 99-48
11/13/11 vs. Texas-Pan American Evanston, Ill. W, 60-36
Charleston Classic
11/17/11 vs. LSU Charleston, S.C. W, 88-82
11/18/11 vs. Tulsa Charleston, S.C. W, 69-65
11/20/11 vs. Seton Hall Charleston, S.C. W, 80-73

11/25/11 vs. Stony Brook Evanston, Ill. W, 63-58
11/29/11 at Georgia Tech Atlanta, Ga. (Philips Arena) W, 76-60
12/02/11 vs. Mississippi Valley State Evanston, Ill. W, 92-67
12/04/11 vs. #7/8 Baylor Evanston, Ill. L, 69-41
12/15/11 vs. Texas Southern Evanston, Ill. W, 81-51
12/17/11 vs. Central Connecticut Evanston, Ill. W, 70-64
12/18/11 vs. Eastern Illinois Evanston, Ill. W, 87-72
12/22/11 at #23/21 Creighton Omaha, Neb. L, 87-79
Ace Happy
MVC Recruit
MVC Recruit
 
Posts: 19
Joined: August 10th, 2010, 3:43 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


cron