2012-13 KenPoms Preseason Projections

by **WuShock Reaper** » October 30th, 2012, 1:12 pm

2012-13 KenPoms Preseason Projections: http://kenpom.com/

1st - Creighton (#30)
2nd - Wichita State (#46)
3rd - Northern Iowa (#48)
4th - Illinois State (#86)
5th - Evansville (#111)
6th - Missouri State (#123)
7th - Indiana State (#150)
8th - Drake (#204)
9th - Bradley (#234)
10th - Southern Illinois (#236)

**Sponsor**

by **ictjay** » October 30th, 2012, 1:16 pm

WuShock Reaper wrote:2012-13 KenPoms Preseason Projections: http://kenpom.com/

1st - Creighton (#30)
2nd - Wichita State (#46)
3rd - Northern Iowa (#48)
4th - Illinois State (#86)
5th - Evansville (#111)
6th - Missouri State (#123)
7th - Indiana State (#150)
8th - Drake (#204)
9th - Bradley (#234)
10th - Southern Illinois (#236)

Always fun to look at these at midseason. I see no less than 15 teams ranked above the top 3 Valley teams that can't hold a candle to our top 3.

by **agrinut** » October 31st, 2012, 8:04 am

WuShock Reaper wrote:2012-13 KenPoms Preseason Projections: http://kenpom.com/

1st - Creighton (#30)
2nd - Wichita State (#46)
3rd - Northern Iowa (#48)
4th - Illinois State (#86)
5th - Evansville (#111)
6th - Missouri State (#123)
7th - Indiana State (#150)
8th - Drake (#204)
9th - Bradley (#234)
10th - Southern Illinois (#236)

This makes the most sense out of all the predictions out there. To all those that will see this and complain pleas remember, just because you return players does not mean they are good players. I will take you talent over Senior role players everyday.

by **Wufan** » October 31st, 2012, 11:33 am

Wichita State, Indiana State, and Drake lose some points in KenPom as he does not factor JUCOs into the equation. Transfers and top 100 freshman are evaluated along with returning players. Also, anyone that has a freshman that will be a major contributor, but was ranked outside the top 100 does not get credit for said player (MSU).

by **FeartheQ** » October 31st, 2012, 12:58 pm

Wufan wrote:Wichita State, Indiana State, and Drake lose some points in KenPom as he does not factor JUCOs into the equation. Transfers and top 100 freshman are evaluated along with returning players. Also, anyone that has a freshman that will be a major contributor, but was ranked outside the top 100 does not get credit for said player (MSU).

Thanks for the tidbit