BEARZ77 wrote:ShoxNAwe wrote:Coach Marshall seems to top himself one way or another every year. Hard to imagine someone saying a few years ago that "Marshall is in over his head in this conference."
The funny thing about that is how critical WSU fans have been towards Muller and yet his 1st two years in the Valley were better than Marshalls were. I'm not saying Muller will ever have success of Marshall's level, and Marshall had established his credentials before at Winthrop; just saying it seems a bit disingenuous to be so quick to dismiss Muller. And please don't play that card about Muller inheriting a much better situation; Marshall still had 2 starters from the sweet 16 team left, a future NBA guy in Meckel, a top 10 prep school recruit in Ellis, an experienced D-1 transfer in Thomson, Durley, Hatch etc. etc. What it shows is that until a coach gets his guys and his system in place, it's really hard to evaluate the job they're doing. Again I'm not knocking Marshall, just pointing out he struggled those first two years just like a lot of coaches do when they have to mold a program to their vision of what they want, until they get a majority of their guys with enough experience in their system. I have no clue what Muller's success will be; hell I have no idea what Lusk's will be, but I know it should start to show this year or you then begin to have doubts.
The interesting thing about this is that I think a large percentage of WSU's fanbase actually disagrees with this, and are somewhat high on Muller. Obviously that's not seen as much on here, but I've defended Muller here, as have others, and a lot of people have expressed a lot of good expectations for him moving forward on ShockerNet.
I thought his first year was embarrassing from what preseason expectations for that team were, but his second year was undoubtedly a success.
As for the comments about WSU, seems a bit "disingenuous" to draw a correlation between an Illinois State team predicted to
finish second in the conference which suffered no major injuries, to a team predicted to finish
sixth in the conference which lost its starting PG for most of the conference season, leaving the team with, if I remember right, two upper classmen. Not to mention the vast difference in conference strength between those two periods.
But I do understand your point.