- photo.JPG (59.48 KiB) Viewed 1064 times
Wufan wrote:agrinut wrote:Cotton was incredible, if he can continue to be a threat offensively Wichita will be extremely tough to guard. Just a question, does Early need to be sit down so he can reevaluate where he is on the team. He seems selfish the times I've watched him this year, low BBIQ.
Cotton was a man! The Shocker starting guards are 111:38 A:TO ratio on the season. Carter starting to look like a player! Early does not play well in a physical game. Fun game to watch! Shockers looked good.
bleach wrote:Not saying they won't win the league but expected a little more depth to be there.
Snaggletooth wrote:Bluejay09Bear06 wrote:Shox just keep rolling. Question: is Cuonzo's seat getting hot in Knoxville?
From what I have seen on the Tennessee site - very hot. They are not impressed with him and are starting to complain.
bleach wrote:I guess we saw different games. My 16 yr old son and I both thought the Shox looked very beatable.
Tenn isn't very good (not poor by any means) and played the Shox equal.
Not saying they won't win the league but expected a little more depth to be there.
bleach wrote:I guess we saw different games. My 16 yr old son and I both thought the Shox looked very beatable. We both rode the Shox final 4 ride last year but thought they looked REAL good 4 players deep and there wasn't much else this year. Tenn isn't very good (not poor by any means) and played the Shox equal.
Not saying they won't win the league but expected a little more depth to be there.
2livewu wrote:bleach wrote:I guess we saw different games. My 16 yr old son and I both thought the Shox looked very beatable. We both rode the Shox final 4 ride last year but thought they looked REAL good 4 players deep and there wasn't much else this year. Tenn isn't very good (not poor by any means) and played the Shox equal.
Not saying they won't win the league but expected a little more depth to be there.
Well since no team is going to go undefeated, then I guess all 351 are "beatable".
But that's not exactly what you meant, so let's clarify a couple of things.
You and your 16 year old son don't know squat about basketball.
Can Duke beat WSU, Kentucky, Kansas? Of course. Can WSU beat them? You bet. It's going to be about coaching and who plays well that day.
But make no mistake. This WSU team is on a different level than the rest of the Valley. Somebody will catch them on an off day, or when their team is hot, and hats off to them when it happens. But don't act like WSU is vulnerable to anyone in the Valley. Maybe if 3 starters miss the conference again, maybe.
By the way, when Baker is healthy, WSU is 25-3 in his career. You could almost say 25-2 because he was hurt going into the UT game last season, but then you'd have to not count today's game.
They are beatable, but only if they beat themselves in this league.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], tribecalledquest and 61 guests