Aargh wrote:I must still be in my kinder, gentler posting mode.
Drake isn't very good. Trust me, that's the kinder and gentler description.
So we're on pace for yet another Bradley/Drake showdown in STL. I can hardly wait!
Aargh wrote:I must still be in my kinder, gentler posting mode.
Drake isn't very good. Trust me, that's the kinder and gentler description.
Wufan wrote:ISUb goes down to St Louis.
PowderBlue wrote:Wufan wrote:ISUb goes down to St Louis.
Ugly game. Khristian Smith came out with 2 fouls a little over halfway through the first half and the wheels came off. They looked incredible for the first 9 minutes, flying around on defense, owning the boards, great movement on offense. After that it was just awful. No ball movement. Poor shooting. Guys pointing fingers on defense instead of helping. Bad, bad, bad. Hopefully that isn't the norm. Yuck.
Lansing mentioned in his postgame that the lack of focus has been an issue in practice as well. Sadness ensued.
rlh04d wrote:PowderBlue wrote:Wufan wrote:ISUb goes down to St Louis.
Ugly game. Khristian Smith came out with 2 fouls a little over halfway through the first half and the wheels came off. They looked incredible for the first 9 minutes, flying around on defense, owning the boards, great movement on offense. After that it was just awful. No ball movement. Poor shooting. Guys pointing fingers on defense instead of helping. Bad, bad, bad. Hopefully that isn't the norm. Yuck.
Lansing mentioned in his postgame that the lack of focus has been an issue in practice as well. Sadness ensued.
I missed this game. Was there a lot of potential I can't see in the box score? 32% at home LOOKS bad, but I learned my lesson about having opinions based on box scores.
I'll hang up and listen.
Cdizzle wrote:
There are only two possible explanations in the entire world, one involves plastic wrap over the basket, and the other involves a basketball with a remote-controlled electromagnet inside being controlled by an assistant on the opposing team.
jtuner38 wrote:It was either just 1 bad game, or IUPUI is gonna be better then they have been in the past. Simple as that.
glm38 wrote:Just got around to watching the rest of the Shockers Memphis game. As others have stated a little ragged on offense but great at the other end. At times Baker looks to me like a man playing against boys. He looks like he can get a good shot whenever he wants.
I was impressed with Carter too. He looks bigger and stronger this year. He'll be a load for the rest of the conference.
Evan Wessel? I get that he's a smart player and plays good D. But he looks horrid on offense. If he plays a lot of minutes I could see that being a real liability against the better teams especially come the big dance.
glm38 wrote:Evan Wessel? I get that he's a smart player and plays good D. But he looks horrid on offense. If he plays a lot of minutes I could see that being a real liability against the better teams especially come the big dance.
rlh04d wrote:glm38 wrote:Evan Wessel? I get that he's a smart player and plays good D. But he looks horrid on offense. If he plays a lot of minutes I could see that being a real liability against the better teams especially come the big dance.
I think he's a liability playing the 4 given his size against bigger teams, but I don't think that's a problem in the Valley.
In the Dance, yeah. Hopefully by the time the Dance rolls around WSU will have a better developed 4/5 height lineup. That'll likely depend on Shaq's continued performance and Nurger's development.
As a 3, though, Wessel's tremendous, lack of offensive ability or not.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: MissouriValleyUnite and 98 guests