UAB to the MVC?

Discuss the MVC hoops season here.

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby TheAsianSensation » March 24th, 2015, 11:29 pm

rlh04d wrote:I think you're incorrect here. The AAC at this point is very likely to add a non-football school.

The AAC currently has 11 full members. Navy will be joining this coming football season as a football-only member, as Navy's other sports are not competitive enough for full AAC membership.

Which means the AAC now has 12 football members and 11 members for all other sports. The AAC is unlikely to maintain an unbalanced lineup in all non-football sports, and they're absolutely not going to add another full-member to round off the other sports, which would put their football conference at 13.

IMO, either someone leaves within the year, or the AAC will be adding a school without football.

I think the MWC is in a similar boat, although I think the MWC will add Gonzaga at some point. They also have 11 full members and 12 football members, leaving an obvious opening for a single school without football.

The problem is I agree with you completely, but the MWC has gone with the 12/11 split for a couple years now, and the Big East is about to do the same. I think that 12/11 is untenable in the long-term, but why won't they make the move?

I know the AAC is gunshy about non-football programs. But they have to swallow their pride. No matter if it's Wichita or VCU, they need to make a move. And more importantly, get the Floridas and Tulane and ECU out of the 200s in the RPI.
http://bracketball.blogspot.com/ A national version of the world-famous TAS Bracketology. Spread the word
TheAsianSensation
MVCfans.com
MVCfans.com
 
Posts: 1175
Joined: April 6th, 2012, 7:23 am

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby rlh04d » March 25th, 2015, 5:15 am

TheAsianSensation wrote:The problem is I agree with you completely, but the MWC has gone with the 12/11 split for a couple years now, and the Big East is about to do the same. I think that 12/11 is untenable in the long-term, but why won't they make the move?

I know the AAC is gunshy about non-football programs. But they have to swallow their pride. No matter if it's Wichita or VCU, they need to make a move. And more importantly, get the Floridas and Tulane and ECU out of the 200s in the RPI.

Yep. Which is part of the problem I have with joining the AAC. The bottom of their conference is nearly as bad as the bottom of the MVC.

I think WSU is GOING to join the AAC, not necessarily that I WANT them to join the AAC. I only see the AAC as preferable over staying in a Valley that continuously refuses to improve.

And yeah, I can understand why the AAC is gunshy about non-football programs, what with how many non-football programs abandoned them for the ACC. Oh, wait :Beer:

You're right, though. I personally think they were waiting to see how things were going to shake out at first and see if they lost any other schools. My understanding is that they have a TV contract look-in coming up with the possibility at increasing the per-school payouts in the very near future, though, which could easily force their hand.
User avatar
rlh04d
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2442
Joined: February 24th, 2012, 9:15 pm

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby rlh04d » March 25th, 2015, 5:22 am

Rambler63 wrote:Bradley took an enormous financial hit to repair their program under a new AD, and despite terrible weakness in the bottom four programs, the MVC is neck and neck with the West Coast for the 9th best hoops conference, only marginally behind the AAC and A-10.

I just don't get how WSU thinks they'll be better off elsewhere, especially when big conference programs are throwing $3 million-plus offers at the coach who lifted them out of the MVC cellar only a few years ago.

1) Take Wichita State out of those numbers and add Wichita State to the AAC or A-10, and the MVC isn't even close to either of those two conferences.The MVC is not battling for #9 without WSU. Remove WSU from the current rankings and the Valley falls to .503 and 13th place. With the Ivy League catching up.

2) Wichita State was in the Sweet 16 two seasons prior to Marshall's entrance and in the AP top 10 the season before Marshall's entrance, prior to a team personnel explosion. Either you have a weird definition of "the MVC cellar" or you don't know what you're talking about. WSU hasn't been in the "cellar," other than Marshall's first year, since the beginning of the 2000s when Coach Turgeon, the current Maryland coach, arrived.

3) If you think the potential of Loyola's market is going to suddenly be the paradigm shift that causes the MVC to make TV revenue, you're confused.
User avatar
rlh04d
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2442
Joined: February 24th, 2012, 9:15 pm

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby rlh04d » March 25th, 2015, 5:39 am

pafan wrote:
rlh04d wrote:Unless the MVC can monetize WSU/UNI's success lately into an improved TV deal that's bringing in real revenue. The MVC's TV contract expires in October 2016. Add UAB and another quality program and get us $2-300k a year in TV revenue, and I'm all for WSU staying. WSU will be very good again next year. If IlSt and UNI are at-large teams as well, that could be a big negotiating point.


By the time the MVC TV deal is up again, I think we'll have a pretty good idea whether these second-tier sports networks (NBCSN, FOX Sports 1, CBS Sports) will be successful. If they are, then the MVC should be able to get some cash out of one of them.

But for the moment the FS1 deal with the Big East looks like a money pit for FOX. The TV ratings for the Big East tournament were atrocious - 414,000 viewers for the championship game. The BE championship lead-in program, a Nascar Nationwide series race, had 5x the viewers.

The MVC championship game, on CBS, and lacking the conference's biggest fan base, was around 1.3 million viewers.

Colonial and A10 games on NBCSN have been doing even worse than the BE. The Colonial championship drew 90,000 viewers. The best-viewed A10 quarterfinal game drew 95,000 (The semis and champs were on CBS Sports and CBS). Those two games were beaten by Formula 1 qualifying (airing at 2 in the morning!) and Cycling. Cycling!

It is my suspicion that these networks will not be eager to bid up anything the MVC has to offer.

I agree with TAS that the only way FS1 can be successful is by adding more content. That's a situation where you simply need the viewing equivalent of economies of scale. No one is watching FS1 unless they are specifically a Big East fan ... you have to make FS1 a destination for college basketball fans. I don't think the MVC is the solution by any means, either. I think they need at least one major conference and then someone like the Valley to add additional content.

I want to mock Creighton as much as the next guy, but FS1 is only a failure if Fox doesn't stay dedicated to it. If their goal is to build a long-term contender to ESPN, they can't be influenced much by short-term rankings. Fox has the money to lose. They have the Big East contract for another decade. They have to keep being aggressive and the ratings will come, as the network gains market share. If they overreact to early rankings, it'll go down as a massive failure and they'll lose tons of money.

I also don't think you necessarily need competition to increase TV revenue. ESPN has shown time and time again that they'll give conferences increased concessions without any actual competition. Look at the ACC's recent deals ... they've moved up their TV contract considerably without even flirting with another destination. ESPN's a heartless monstrosity, but their TV contracts aren't as by the numbers as one would expect. They could have gotten the Syracuse/Pitt/ND additions to the ACC for free if they wanted, and instead probably overpaid for them. In part to settle conference realignment down and make sure they didn't lose teams to another conference not on their networks (Big 12), and to keep conferences happy so they don't have as much motivation to let a new network's pitch matter.
User avatar
rlh04d
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2442
Joined: February 24th, 2012, 9:15 pm

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby DoubleJayAlum » March 25th, 2015, 6:48 am

Never say never, but I don't see the AAC adding a nonfootball school for 2 main reasons:

1) the members that were formally in the Big East experienced first hand what can happen when you mix both football and nonfootball schools. They essentially lost their conference due to the whole football experiment. It seems unlikely that they will willingly go down that road again unless the point comes when they have no choice. UConn and Cincy fans are already wondering if they made a tragic mistake in playing the football gambit. UCOnns boards are littered with threads about how basketball recruiting has taken a hit since joining the AAC.

2) Some of the southern schools simply don't care about basketball - they are all football all the time. That is primarily the reason their RPIs are so miserable. If you don't care, you don't invest because you think the money is either wasted or better spent elsewhere. If you don't beleive in basketball, you won't be in favor of adding a basketball only school.
User avatar
DoubleJayAlum
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2300
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 12:05 pm

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby uniftw » March 25th, 2015, 8:48 am

I get WSU fans issues with the MVC right now.

The AAC bottom is every bit as bad as the MVC. If the MVC makes a right move, for the first time in a decade or two, and manages to land UAB plus one other strong school does it not help ease some WSU issues?

It would then give WSU a couple partners in national name recoginition - UNI, UAB and say Murray State/Belmont. ISUr seems to be trending up if they can develop the mental side of the game.

WSU, UNI, UAB, Murray State and ISUr would make a very strong top of the conference. Yes, we'd still have dead weight with the bottom - Drake, Bradley, etc... but if Bradley hires right and we add Bradley in with WSU, UNI, UAB, Murray State and ISUr...I mean...
uniftw
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: January 20th, 2011, 9:01 pm

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby Play Angry » March 25th, 2015, 9:26 am

Belmont is a very scary add to me. That program is Rick Byrd, and he is old (61). Facilities, funding, and otherwise, they are entirely unimpressive. He has done a great job and reached the Tournament 7 times in 10 years. However, how many of those were they good enough to receive an at-large bid had they fallen short in the conference tournament? None. Which is the same number of wins they have registered in those 7 trips to the dance.

It will be a real shame if we have to add yet another private school in the event UAB is admitted to placate the current anklebiters. The selection is very underwhelming.
Play Angry
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 814
Joined: October 17th, 2013, 12:06 pm

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby unipanther99 » March 25th, 2015, 9:34 am

I would much rather have Murray than Belmont, and would rather keep the current 10 than add even UAB. I'm still unsure of their long-term commitment to athletics. It seems like most here thought it was a bad idea a year ago when it was discussed. One round of 32 trip shouldn't change that IMO.

I think it's best for everyone to sit tight and see how football shakes out over the next 5 years. Does the current 4 tier system stay in place (Power 5, non-Power 5 FBS, FCS scholarship, FCS non-scholarship), or does it change (Revenue generating, non-revenue generating, non-scholly does whatever)? If that happens, katy-bar-the-door for realignment.
User avatar
unipanther99
MVCfans.com
MVCfans.com
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: August 4th, 2010, 3:18 pm
Location: Iowa City

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby jwa123 » March 25th, 2015, 10:11 am

I really have concerns about Murray. What to do with their football program as there is absolutely no guarantee that the MVFC would take them on and I am sure they won't add just one to get to 11 members. Also, Murray is in the boondocks with little to no market. Perhaps I am looking at it too narrowly but at this juncture Murray does not excite me.

I understand why the fans of WSU have dissatisfaction with the MVC and would like to move. At ISUr, there is the steady drum beat to increase attendance. I am of the opinion it's hard to get folks to come to the games regularly when there is a steady number of conference foes rolling into RBA with 200+ RPIs. Now if many of the conference members had RPIs less than 100 and each year you had 3 or 4 schools with RPIs less than 50 then you have an attraction that will draw bigger crowds. So as I see it, if WSU gets an opportunity to better themselves they have to go for it even if they don't have attendance problems. As a school, who do you want to play consistently year in and year out. A steady diet of 200+ RPI schools?

In the list of schools listed above as having potential to be good I would add SIU. Yes I know Lowery torpedoed the place and Barry is doing his best to right the ship and we will have to see where that goes. However, SIU has a solid history and reputation of being an excellent bball program. I can see the day where SIU is again going to be right back. The potential is there.
jwa123
MVC starter
MVC starter
 
Posts: 397
Joined: August 3rd, 2011, 3:44 pm

Re: UAB to the MVC?

Postby BCPanther » March 25th, 2015, 11:17 am

I like UNI, NDSU, and WSU to the Mountain West together.

Gets that league to 14 football member and 14 All sports members. Really evens things up for them.

Split Divisions East-West for Football and continue to play 18 basketball games. No division split for basketball

East
UNI
NDSU
UNLV
Colorado State
Air Force
Wyoming
New Mexico

West
Boise State
San Diego State
Utah State
Hawaii//WSU for basketball
San Jose State
Fresno State
Nevada

Makes WAY too much sense and would be one hell of a basketball league and definitely be the top Group of Five football league.
BCPanther
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: August 8th, 2010, 9:10 am

PreviousNext

Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fetz86, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Kyle_Saluki_17 and 68 guests