UEACES80 wrote:Myself I just get tired of the piling on UE - the suggestion that UE fans don't want to win or we are satisfied
The fact that many UE fans think extending Simmons at this time more than proves the point. It's not piling on if it's rooted in facts.
UEACES80 wrote: Feel free to send letters to the UE Athletic Department and UE Admin. or better yet the MVC Commissioner to demand that UE and the other 7 dwarfs of the MVC (in your eyes) play only top 40 teams from P5 conferences.
Thanks for the hyperbole. The facts are not hyperbole, though they seem so in the other direction. Over the past 5 years, UE's NonCon SOS has averaged 271, with a high of 233 5 years ago. With what everyone knew would be competitive and in 2016 perhaps even at-large candidate teams, those numbers were 312 and 313 in 2015 and 2016, respectively. That's in the bottom 11% of all non-conference schedules in D1 college basketball last year. When you are in the bottom 15%, you are trying to be there. It didn't accidentally happen and everyone you thought was going to be great just happened to suck that year.
No one is saying Evansville should have the #1 NonCon SOS (your hyperbole). No one is even saying no Valley teams should ever have a SOS in the range Evansville has had the past 5 years. There can be a place for a pretty crappy schedule when a new coach is rebuilding a program and trying to build a winning culture.
Everyone is saying don't tout win totals against abysmal schedules that resulted in no meaningful post-season invitations as reasons for coaching contract extensions in year 10.
The fact is, regardless of the name of the institution, that sort of policy hurts the league. That 313 boat anchor weighs down the entire league. It eliminates a good team like 2016 Evansville from at-large consideration before the season begins. It hurts the RPIs and SOS of other league teams. Which can hurt their ability to get into the tournament, or get a decent seed if they do. Which can hurt said teams ability to win games in the tournament. And at this point, after years of several teams using this policy, winning said games in the tournament is pretty much the only possible way to build any reputability for the league.
A contract extension in this scenario is 100% the Evansville administration saying "we approve of the direction of the program and are not able or willing to change it in order to make improvements." And that flies directly in the face of any conference that is trying to be worth a damn. Which can be very frustrating to fans of other teams in such leagues. But, perhaps as much as Evansville appears to not give a damn, so too has the league thrown in the towel on ever being relevant again. Their actions would seem to indicate that is the case.