MVCfans.com

Oklahoma State: 16-9, 29 RPI, 20 KP, 4 Top 50 wins, receiving Top 25 votes, currently projected as an 8 seed in Lunardi's Bracketology.

Bad, bad loss.

Oklahoma State: 17-9, Tied-5th in Big XII, 28 RPI, 20 KP

Aces1982 just makes it too easy. Has he ever not embarrassed himself on any website?

*crickets*

TheObserver wrote:Oklahoma State: 16-9, 29 RPI, 20 KP, 4 Top 50 wins, receiving Top 25 votes, currently projected as an 8 seed in Lunardi's Bracketology.

Bad, bad loss.

You have to admit it looked like a bad loss when they started so poorly (0-5?) in their conference though? If you saw this turnaround coming I want to go to Vegas and lay down some sports bets with you!

I know that doesn't matter now. All that matters is how a team finishes overall. Good news for WSU. That helps your resume if you don't win arch madness.

glm38 wrote:

TheObserver wrote:Oklahoma State: 16-9, 29 RPI, 20 KP, 4 Top 50 wins, receiving Top 25 votes, currently projected as an 8 seed in Lunardi's Bracketology.

Bad, bad loss.

You have to admit it looked like a bad loss when they started so poorly (0-5?) in their conference though? If you saw this turnaround coming I want to go to Vegas and lay down some sports bets with you!

I know that doesn't matter now. All that matters is how a team finishes overall. Good news for WSU. That helps your resume if you don't win arch madness.

I think the point that a lot of WSU fans made is that the team that beat WSU in Wichita was WAY better than the team that started Big 12 play 0-5. That's starting to show now.

Stickboy46 wrote:

glm38 wrote:

TheObserver wrote:Oklahoma State: 16-9, 29 RPI, 20 KP, 4 Top 50 wins, receiving Top 25 votes, currently projected as an 8 seed in Lunardi's Bracketology.

Bad, bad loss.

You have to admit it looked like a bad loss when they started so poorly (0-5?) in their conference though? If you saw this turnaround coming I want to go to Vegas and lay down some sports bets with you!

I know that doesn't matter now. All that matters is how a team finishes overall. Good news for WSU. That helps your resume if you don't win arch madness.

I think the point that a lot of WSU fans made is that the team that beat WSU in Wichita was WAY better than the team that started Big 12 play 0-5. That's starting to show now.

Sure. I watched that game and I wouldn't have thought ok state would play that poorly to start their conference season either. But ANY team can play well above their capabilities for one game. That could have the case in this instance. But given their turnaround they are just pretty good.

glm38 wrote:

TheObserver wrote:Oklahoma State: 16-9, 29 RPI, 20 KP, 4 Top 50 wins, receiving Top 25 votes, currently projected as an 8 seed in Lunardi's Bracketology.

Bad, bad loss.

You have to admit it looked like a bad loss when they started so poorly (0-5?) in their conference though? If you saw this turnaround coming I want to go to Vegas and lay down some sports bets with you!

I know that doesn't matter now. All that matters is how a team finishes overall. Good news for WSU. That helps your resume if you don't win arch madness.

I was there at the game. I had watched what OSU had done previously as well. They did not look like a bad team. That's why I said what I said.

You're right on with your second statement. That was a brutal schedule to start out with and most of their losses outside of their West Virginia opener have been fairly close. January 12th was a bit too early for the low-IQ Aces poster to start calling shots. And as usual, he made himself look like an idiot. It's about par for the course with him.

Good thing he didn't take the bet... (like anybody would take a bet with that welcher anyways)

It's funny that a WSU poster is crowing over how a home loss to the Big 12's 5th place team (out of 10) is now a good loss. If that's a good loss where would WSU rank in the Big 12?

Red wrote:It's funny that a WSU poster is crowing over how a home loss to the Big 12's 5th place team (out of 10) is now a good loss. If that's a good loss where would WSU rank in the Big 12?

Good question.

Similarly, where would a team like Illinois State finish in the OVC?

TheObserver wrote:

Red wrote:It's funny that a WSU poster is crowing over how a home loss to the Big 12's 5th place team (out of 10) is now a good loss. If that's a good loss where would WSU rank in the Big 12?

Good question.

Similarly, where would a team like Illinois State finish in the OVC?

I assumed you would deflect to antagonize rather than answer the question honestly, baller.

Red wrote:

TheObserver wrote:

Red wrote:It's funny that a WSU poster is crowing over how a home loss to the Big 12's 5th place team (out of 10) is now a good loss. If that's a good loss where would WSU rank in the Big 12?

Good question.

Similarly, where would a team like Illinois State finish in the OVC?

I assumed you would deflect to antagonize rather than answer the question honestly, baller.

Deflect? You mean like what 95% of this thread has become?

Yah, that's what I thought, snappy.