Chuck A wrote:MVC Expansion candidate and WAC 3-seed UT Arlington (20-13), knocks off #2- seed Tarleton State (23-9) for a Finals matchup with #1-seed Grand Canyon.
harley93davidson wrote::Cheers:Chuck A wrote:MVC Expansion candidate and WAC 3-seed UT Arlington (20-13), knocks off #2- seed Tarleton State (23-9) for a Finals matchup with #1-seed Grand Canyon.
If msu goes fbs and we need to replace them, its uta or bust for me, we asked umkc and nku to invest more money, they couldnt, uta already invests in the program. if it helps the privates get more students even better, but im wholly uninterested in invitiing programs that are uninterested in playing high level mid major basketball. We knocked it out of the park with murray, belmont, and uic... why make a mistake now? Im so wholeheartedly pro mvc success and for those reasons im wholeheartedly pro arlington. anyone other than uta would be a massive mistake, in my honest opinion.
harley93davidson wrote::Cheers:Chuck A wrote:MVC Expansion candidate and WAC 3-seed UT Arlington (20-13), knocks off #2- seed Tarleton State (23-9) for a Finals matchup with #1-seed Grand Canyon.
If msu goes fbs and we need to replace them, its uta or bust for me, we asked umkc and nku to invest more money, they couldnt, uta already invests in the program. if it helps the privates get more students even better, but im wholly uninterested in invitiing programs that are uninterested in playing high level mid major basketball. We knocked it out of the park with murray, belmont, and uic... why make a mistake now? Im so wholeheartedly pro mvc success and for those reasons im wholeheartedly pro arlington. anyone other than uta would be a massive mistake, in my honest opinion.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 211 guests