SubGod22 wrote:He's ok. Part of the reason he scores is because Drake is so bad and he's one of the few capable. He's a solid player but he's nothing special to me. He has a lot to work on to be a complete player and I'm not sure he ever does that.
Wufan wrote:Timmer's good. I do like Frankamp, and I believe he can be better than Timmer, but today I'd take Timmer. There's no way I'd take Simon over Timmer. This is a pre-season All-MVC team, and Timmer has earned it over the competition.
tribecalledquest wrote:Im not a fan of Frankamp but I could be proven wrong of course.
I think he will struggle with alot more attention paid to him.
tribecalledquest wrote:Im not a fan of Frankamp but I could be proven wrong of course.
I think he will struggle with alot more attention paid to him.
SubGod22 wrote:I'm not much a fan of Frankamp either, but I'm not sure how much more attention is going to be given to him. It's not like he's one of the top 3 players on the roster. I'll give Conner credit for doing what's been asked of him and improving some of his weaknesses, but his game is what it is. If he finds some consistency in his shot he'll be a nice weapon off the bench, preferably as an undersized SG.
If things go well, he won't be playing much PG by the time MVC play rolls around. I would hope Smith and Reaves will have locked up most of the minutes at that point. Personally, I actually prefer Simon running the point over Frankamp, but that's me. With that said, I don't want Simon running the point too much either.
Cdizzle wrote:tribecalledquest wrote:Im not a fan of Frankamp but I could be proven wrong of course.
I think he will struggle with alot more attention paid to him.
He has struggled with any D1 attention paid to him.
But then struggle is a relative term.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: BCPanther, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 30 guests